tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.comments2023-08-09T20:54:23.763+08:00風蕭蕭Shiu.Shiuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06793043687184409596noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-46998035180317866762012-03-29T05:58:14.253+08:002012-03-29T05:58:14.253+08:00http://fishandhappiness.blogspot.com/2012/03/blog-...http://fishandhappiness.blogspot.com/2012/03/blog-post_28.htmlAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14094712706557357029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-49082645751443243572011-09-01T21:21:12.932+08:002011-09-01T21:21:12.932+08:00蕭先生:
你好!你的文章加入了哲學與經濟等概念,緊貼生活,教人思考,我真的很佩服。
其實,本人正...蕭先生:<br /><br />你好!你的文章加入了哲學與經濟等概念,緊貼生活,教人思考,我真的很佩服。<br /><br />其實,本人正在外國修讀哲學,所以想冒昧請教蕭先生怎樣才能讀好哲學?Cranehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01078258296177619745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-65374792272699177672011-08-31T16:25:32.041+08:002011-08-31T16:25:32.041+08:00佛利民理解的馬克思根本不對。佛利民理解的馬克思根本不對。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-13517793328645264222010-11-29T17:52:24.603+08:002010-11-29T17:52:24.603+08:00蕭公子,您是我非常尊重的人物,你的意見,很多時都會讓我對事對人有新的看法,雖然,看法不一定會跟你吻合...蕭公子,您是我非常尊重的人物,你的意見,很多時都會讓我對事對人有新的看法,雖然,看法不一定會跟你吻合!<br /><br />炒樓,我想,跟其他投資活動一樣,都是賺錢的途徑而已,無可厚非!<br /><br />但政府,在責任上,是作為社會資源公義地、有效的分配者,我覺得,政府遏止炒樓是沒理由,它應該增加房屋供應,提供住屋津貼、提供非贏利房屋予香港居民,我覺得,那是責無旁貸!<br /><br />香港政府,既不在房屋供應上做功夫,卻干擾房屋轉售 , 真是只許政府賣地,不準市民借貸買房,真是被政府吹Q漲!香港 Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01191930934857246671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-76237270629097517422010-11-05T11:28:43.986+08:002010-11-05T11:28:43.986+08:00中國人理性反日,日本無恥政客,刪改侵華歷史,卻將撞船意外跨大,恃著有美國撐腰故意在國際上欺壓中國,但...中國人理性反日,日本無恥政客,刪改侵華歷史,卻將撞船意外跨大,恃著有美國撐腰故意在國際上欺壓中國,但我國卻任由日本繼續去胡說八道,令不懂歷史的人都很易相信日本政客的大話,今一還敢將撞船意外上轉youtube,中國還要忍到何時呢?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-91980956885103333132010-05-06T11:12:49.128+08:002010-05-06T11:12:49.128+08:00'李敖並非是那種敢於挑戰威權政府的人物"
應該不是吧!
他自己在坐牢前都預測,應該...'李敖並非是那種敢於挑戰威權政府的人物"<br />應該不是吧!<br />他自己在坐牢前都預測,應該會坐牢~<br />他沒這勇氣就不會去冒坐牢的風險了~<br />當然做的事,是反抗政府對於自由民主的打壓~<br />出書被禁也是~<br />這難道不是"挑戰威權政府"的行為嗎?從容而就https://www.blogger.com/profile/07452435027643217205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-307758393258974702010-02-03T00:21:46.335+08:002010-02-03T00:21:46.335+08:00In other words, in simple majority there is only o...In other words, in simple majority there is only one "battle". The candidate only need to win one battle (or just one more vote in a battle), he/she can take ALL.<br /><br />However, in the electoral vote-system, there are many "battles". The candidate have to win most of the important battles. This certainly is more difficult...<br /><br />BushAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-2959364524900819442010-02-02T23:46:25.458+08:002010-02-02T23:46:25.458+08:00Put it simply: the chance of 僅贏對手一票 in one area is...Put it simply: the chance of 僅贏對手一票 in one area is much greater than the chance of 僅贏對手一票 in many areas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-13918634979852022082010-02-02T21:51:00.491+08:002010-02-02T21:51:00.491+08:00To Shiu Shiu
All participants have equal chance to...To Shiu Shiu<br />All participants have equal chance to earn "winner takes all". Eg. candidate A gets "winner takes all" vote in area X, but candidate B may get "winner takes all" vote in area Y. It is equal chance. If they use simple majority system, candidate A may take ALL, if he/she only get 1 more vote! No system is perfect, and absolute fair.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-27974794873786811482009-05-19T10:21:00.000+08:002009-05-19T10:21:00.000+08:00可以向李登輝求償,詳閱我的部落格:
http://himarxist.blogspot.com/20...可以向李登輝求償,詳閱我的部落格:<br />http://himarxist.blogspot.com/2009/04/indemnifyldh.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-1128034191092069892005-09-30T06:49:00.000+08:002005-09-30T06:49:00.000+08:00「李敖在最早期寫「中西文化論戰」,批判的人物如余秋雨、徐復觀等,並非當權者」其中「余秋雨」應為「胡秋...「李敖在最早期寫「中西文化論戰」,批判的人物如余秋雨、徐復觀等,並非當權者」<BR/>其中「余秋雨」應為「胡秋原」之誤。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-1127689434330950312005-09-26T07:03:00.000+08:002005-09-26T07:03:00.000+08:00I agree with you 100%. Disney was a poor investmen...I agree with you 100%. Disney was a poor investment decision from the outset. It was made without careful thought during a time when Hong Kong economy was down, in the vain hope that tourism might provide an answer to revive the sagging economy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-1118941933396573362005-06-17T01:12:00.000+08:002005-06-17T01:12:00.000+08:00How about the truth of Chicom's mass murdering of ...How about the truth of Chicom's mass murdering of its own people?今评员https://www.blogger.com/profile/07197950874117956653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-1115511002993412732005-05-08T08:10:00.000+08:002005-05-08T08:10:00.000+08:00ms shiu u are good.ms shiu u are good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9750951.post-1110369320291038392005-03-09T19:55:00.000+08:002005-03-09T19:55:00.000+08:00劉嘉鴻 Reply quote from PRHK 討論區:蕭先生的立論,在審議國家總統或地方首長的...<A SRC="http://www.voy.com/181098/5456.html"><B>劉嘉鴻 Reply quote from PRHK 討論區:</B></A>蕭先生的立論,在審議國家總統或地方首長的選舉法時,絕對成立,並應立例堵塞有關被現任總統或首長利用的可能性.但若以此為由力證繼任特首只能完成是屆的餘下任期,似嫌考慮過周,見林不見樹.理由如下:<br /><br />一)基本法的條文極不理想,自是公論,但稱現時特首出缺的條文裡,有關繼任人的年期為缺文,並不確切.此條可稱之為考慮不周(如沒有考慮蕭先生極為有力的論點),亦可說起草人因無能未曾察覺這樣明顯的情況,甚或因政治理由而故意不提,但卻不是缺文,因為條例清楚寫明:經選舉選出的特首,任期五年.<br /><br />二)若繼任特首只能完成餘下任期的說法成立,則有可能出現因餘下任期過短(但亦非太短致使政府可利用行政權力而結合兩任特首的選舉),而無人競選特首的情況.而由於政務司司長規定只能署任半年,會否因此出現憲政真空的情況呢?基本法於此似真的是缺文.權衡蕭先生所提的理由及憲政真空(兩者皆為邏輯可能而非現時出現的情況,亦有行政或權宜辦法對付),取重新開始五年任期較妥.<br /><br />當然理想的情況是基本法已有規定.更理想是特首及立法會皆為普選產生,所有問題都可以民意為依歸,透過討論解決.最理想當然是共產黨倒台,中國有民主,and all,and all……<br /><br />請各高明不吝賜教.<br /><br />另,(一)各位可否不要把內文放在標題裡,閱讀時很困難;(二)不平人批評蕭先生,卻不提任何理由,此之為謾罵;(三)SuperRedBean批評不平人,態度正確,理由卻極為不堪,須狠批以正視聽──點解硬要別人認同你所說的理由,把別人的理據彈得一文不值呢?點解唔可以和平地說出自己的論點,係要攻擊對方呢──辯論的目的便是要別人認同你的理由,有何不可?否則何需辯論?把別人的理據彈得一文不值,若“彈得有道理”,有何不可?“不和平地”說出自己的論點,若論點成立,有何不可?攻擊對方,若對方值得攻擊(如共產黨),論點錯漏百出,有何不可?有何不可?有何不可?Shiu.Shiuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06793043687184409596noreply@blogger.com